Just wanted to share this article:
http://current.newsweek.com/budgettravel/2...isrc=newsletter
Printable View
Just wanted to share this article:
http://current.newsweek.com/budgettravel/2...isrc=newsletter
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (mrs767er @ Apr 17 2009, 01:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>Finally. I heard talk the UK were going to relax restrictions, but didn't think the TSA would follow suit.Quote:
I was in the states last week and i've gotta say the new uniform seems to have done something, as no one was yelling and screaming and the 'officers' were quite friendly compared to what it used to be like. I was impressed!
Yeah, when I was flying out of MSP and they had to double-check my camera bag (I have a high-end dSLR with accessories, not your typical point and shoot). The guy was very polite, conversational, etc. On my way home from ATL, they seemed pretty decent as well, but I didn't have any secondary screening or contact. Then again, they were conversing nicely with an old lady next to me.
Now, that said, this really creeps me out and, well, pisses me off. When it was first introduced, it was supposed to be an alternative to a pat-down during secondary screening. Now, they're using it to replace the metal detector, so if you're flying it's either that or a MANDATORY patdown. Really? Is it really needed? There gets to be a point where we're safe enough, I think, and we don't need *that* much of a privacy invasion in exchange for slightly more security. They say that passenger response has been positive, and that 97% (or whatever it is) of people opt for it over a pat-down. However, it seems like few people actually know what these machines actually do, or even that they're in one. From the New York Times:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>Also, while I'm at it...Quote:
Ms. Jost and her husband own a real estate investment company and fly at least once a week. In an interview last week, she told me that she knew the machines were being tested, and she vowed to stay away from them.
Unwittingly, though, she recently ended up in one at the Miami airport.
“I was stressed out and in a hurry,” she said, when a female screener directed her to one of the boothlike machines. Ms. Jost said she assumed it was another kind of machine, one of those so-called puffer devices that check for explosives traces.
“When I figured it out, I really felt violated and mad at myself,” she said. “I’d been trying to avoid these machines, and I literally walked into one without knowing it. I really did not connect the dots until later when I was sitting on the plane, and I said, oh my God, that was one of those strip search machines.”[/b]
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>When these were originally coming out, I read that the storage capabilities were not disabled. They didn't even exist. That's like starting by saying "there's no light in this room" but later saying that there is, but it is turned off. Even then, even if very undetailed, I would not care to take a naked picture of myself and send it to some random person. When I worked for NW at MSP, I walked by the officer that was making sure nobody entered the secure area through the exit. I mentioned to him that he must have a pretty boring job. His response? "Are you kidding? I get paid $17 [or whatever it was] an hour to look at t*ts all day." THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the type of person you could very well have looking at that photo of you.Quote:
The agency also says that the capability of the machines to store passengers’ images will be disabled, but a lot of people I heard from said they nevertheless worried about the possibility of naked body images being stored and possibly abused.[/b]
Yes, I understand that some security is needed with the airport. But really, we take our shoes off, can't have liquids, everything goes through an x-ray, and we go through a metal detector. Sometimes we get a pat-down. Is that really not enough? Is it worth the privacy invasion? Sorry, but the TSA (at least the heads that make the rules like this) have very little respect in my book.
Sorry, this thing just really strikes a chord with me. I'm seriously starting to consider starting some kind of blog dedicated to things like this. We were talking about this in my philosophy class, and it was nothing but angering for me.
there are gazilions of blogs and articles about this issue.
Pat down--well, do you want the Turkish policewoman to take you into a room 50 ft away from where you just said "see you on board" to the captain (husband) she asks for a pen to complete the forms with the former name on your passport (wrong) then sticks her hands up your sweater to check your bra and says ok--go back?
Or do you want your 70 yr old mom to be taken at CDG (pre 9/11) to check her pacemaker and have the agent shove her hand UNDER her bra and then inside her panties? Sorry, I'll take some stupid lacivious grinning idiot who doesn't know who I am after I leave the scanner and if he or she wants top look at an image that resembles body part--prurient interest is nothing like being physically violated.
Trade off?
Just because it's worse somewhere else, doesn't make the lesser of two evils any more acceptable, in my opinion.
Sorry, I guess I'm kind of showing my politics here. If this is a no-no on the board, let me know...
The whole 9/11 thing was always out of whack in the first place. They got way OVER ANAL about EVERYTHING. I hate to say this but the terrorist actually won. They accomplished alot of damage beyond the twin towers. The whole TSA thing is a joke. SWAT, POLICE, FBI all wrapped into one wannabees. This system created a POST OFFICE EMPLOYEE style enviroment in the airport. They virtually have a license to treat the public like crap with no recourse.
Another thing too. If these machines break down, do you really think they'll stop the flow of luggage coming through? What you don't know can't hurt you at least 99.9 percent of the time.
Pick your poison - pat-down or full-body image scan.
As pax we put up with a lot; long lines, ID verification, pat downs, removing keys, jackets, belts, shoes, jewelry, laptops and showing our toothpaste and shampoo, all so we can see our niece graduate from high school.
When I fly I always think of Lone Watie's line from the Outlaw Josey Wales, "endeavor to persevere".
As far as the full body scan safeguards? I don't put too much stock in them. (The safeguards on medical records haven't worked out to well.)
If there's money to be made, Angelina Jolie/hollywood star scan will somehow "mysteriously" make it onto the internet.
Endeavor to persevere!
spongebue, you're certainly entitled to a pat-down any time you want it, but I'd avise against the Turkish "lady"!!
Not my preference, tho. Maybe you'd object to TSA agent putting your camera down your pants (kinda like the body scan on really personal level?? Sorry, that really was just a point of inane humour, but that's how ridiculous (as Mig and Palms mention so poetically) some of the regs are!! Most of the US agents I've dealt with use the back of their hands but rarely ask to use palms (even in a light pass) Maybe they have well-trained knuckles??
Well, we can have more to laugh about--at least she said I was "OK" after feeling me up--just THE approval a woman dreams about...
And then, get this. The COLOR CODED LEVELS OF SECURITY. What a joke. I was in MaCallen, a rinky dink two gate airport with a security color at orange which was something like be on alert kind of security code, which I bet they never change it to a lower code. Then one fat TSA guy walks by the line looking at each passenger like he knows how to find a terrorist or something. I wanted so badly to ask him...."Hey, what are you doing man"? But being that I was with my wife, I didn't want to get labled as a sht dstrber I opted to keep my mouth shut. BUT WHAT A JOKE MAN. WHAT A JOKE. I'd like to walk behind that TSA guy one day in the middle of his duties and pull down his pants to where only his shorts are exposed so the airport can get a laugh or two.
what if he didn't have on any U-trou?? would that be a "flesh" alert?
My full bodyscan image, so much for TSA safeguards. http://www.nonrev.net/forums/style_e...DIR#>/wink.gif http://www.nonrev.net/forums/style_e...#>/biggrin.gif
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/9...erminal.th.jpg
Actually, that's a photo of part of an art image sandblasted into the granite floor at the AA terminal - LAX.
It's a set of three circles, each with a nude man; according to the artist it's suppose to represent 'humankind's yearning to transcend earthly bounds and soar toward the heavens". Trust me, no one I ever talked to thought those images had anything to do with flying.
You knew it was bound to happen. BBC News - Heathrow worker warned over body scanner misuse
"A Heahrow Airport security guard was given a police warning after he was allegedly caught staring at images of a female colleague in a body scanner."
Aw, take pity; that's probably the "most he's gotten" in years...Quote:
Originally Posted by Migflanker
That didn't take long.