Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Efficiecy of listing via "Flyzed" site ?


  1. #1
    paillard andre
    Guest
    Last end of october, taking the opportunity offered by 'Flyzed' to list on SIN/BKK/SIN sectors to be flown on TG, I made necessary arrangements on TG402/29OCT SIN/BKK and
    TG409/31OCT BKK/SIN
    The flyzed system sent me immediatly a nice written mail, confirming those listings had been duely registered.
    Being confident into it, upon presentation for check-in of SIN/BKK flight, I was extremely surprised to understand that there was ABSOLUTELY NO RECORD of it on listed stand by passengers of this flight.This ended, hopefully, on a positive way.
    Similar case appeared for BKK/SIN sector on above mentioned flight.
    This leads me to understand the efficiency of this pre-listing is not so efficient.
    Did anyone have a similar experience ?


  • #2
    Senior NonRev Correspondent
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    LHR/UK
    Posts
    599
    I've used this system many times and not had a problem, even listings a group of 9 staff in one go. I've even been able to pull up some of the listings that it created for me. I suspect that the problem you encountered may be more to do with specific carriers Reservations and Check-In systems rather than the FLYZED site itself.

  • #3
    paillard andre
    Guest
    Thank you for your opinion . . . . and experience. BUT, can you precise on which carrier this experience took place. My first 'superficial' conclusion is that there are some discrepancies between 'flyzed' system and 'TG' reservation system. This, in spite of the fact that this airline is quoted amongst those on which can be used.
    I feel an updating initiating from flyzed could be advisable.

  • #4
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    vienna-in the heart of europe
    Posts
    109
    i have once tried it on lh and it did work without any problems

  • #5
    Full Member AL-SYD's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sydney - Australia
    Posts
    292
    Unless things have changed a lot recently, isn't only a handful of carriers that require listing via the flyzed site? TG wasn't one of them.
    <span style="font-family:Lucida Sans Unicode">AL - NonRev Correspondent Australia/Oceania/Asia </span>

  • #6
    paillard andre
    Guest
    AL SYD you are absolutely right : this is clearly mentioned on 'Flyzed' site (and after to day's check) following airlines appear : AY - DE - KF - LH - OS - SK - TG - WF.: apparently, TG is included.
    This is as appears reaching FLYZED through AF staff listing internal site.
    Therefore I am tempted to believe that there is something wrong in the connection between Flyzed and TG reservations site.

  • #7
    paillard andre
    Guest
    P.S. Reading my last post, I think it is necessary to precise that the airlines I quoted are only those on which listing looks to be possible. Of course I think all of us know which airlines are member of 'ZED' system, via our own respective airlines organisations.

  • >

    Thread Information

    Users Browsing this Thread

    There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Bookmarks

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •